The board and the code have decoupled. The board recorded nothing for two days; the repos took 13 commits and five new endpoints in the same window. Sprint 0702 ends today with 83% of its work in a queue that has never released anything.
| Measure | 06 Aug | 07 Aug | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Done | 11 | 11 | 0 |
| In review | 74 | 74 | 0 |
| In progress | 4 | 4 | 0 |
| Review median age | 14d | 15d | +1 |
| API surface (consumer) | 100 | 105 | +5 |
| API surface (admin) | 29 | 29 | 0 |
| Person | Owns | Sub. | Cycle | WIP | Commits | Today | Flag |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ayomikun Araoye | backend + admin API | 12 | 5d | 3 | 50 | 10 | oldest WIP 7d, above his 5d median |
| David Samuel | mobile | 16 | 1d | 1 | 27 | 0 | — |
| Philip Chidera | design | 0 | 4d | 0 | — | — | no tracked activity in 8d |
| Promise Udo | admin dashboard | not on board | — | — | 0 | 0 | beevia-admin untouched 8 days |
| Fortune Okwu | supervision | — | — | — | — | — | not a contributor by design |
The sprint closes today with 74 items unreviewed — what actually rolls forward, and is Promise blocked?
The three things worth knowing
Zero board movement in 48 hours, while the code moved a lot. Not one item changed status since the 05 Aug export. In the same window: 13 commits, a new 5-endpoint upload module, an admin user-deletion refactor, and a schema migration. The board has stopped describing the work — treat its counts as a lower bound on delivery, not a measure of it.
The sprint ends today and the review queue has still never released an item. 74 of 89 items (83%) sit in REVIEW/QA at a median age of 15 days, oldest 28. Across the sprint's whole history nothing has ever gone REVIEW/QA → Done. This was the previous report's single recommendation and it did not move.
Six of the previous report's seven recommendations are verifiably unstarted. No reviewer named, no triage, no sizing (0/120 items have estimates), no epic scope, Promise still absent from the board. §6 has the detail.
Nothing was accepted this sprint and nothing will be by tonight. The decision that matters today is what rolls into 0703 and what gets dropped — because carrying 74 unreviewed items forward starts the next sprint in exactly this position.
Sprint 0702 in detail
1.1 How to read the board
120 rows, but 31 are parent Stories that only group their children. 89 rows are real work. Every percentage uses the 89.
Two columns remain unusable, both measurement gaps rather than findings:
Estimation Points: 0 on all 120 → no velocity, no burndown, no forecast.
Epic: blank on all 120 → the Zoho token still lacks ZohoSprints.epic.READ. The 05 Aug UI export shows 40 items do carry epics. Do not read blank as absent.
1.2 Status — frozen
| Status | Leaves | Share |
|---|---|---|
| REVIEW/QA | 74 | 83% |
| Done | 11 | 12% |
| In progress | 4 | 4% |
| Total | 89 |
No item changed status between the 06 Aug and 07 Aug exports — 0 entered review, 0 left, 0 completed. The 05→06 Aug window saw only 2 moves, both In progress → REVIEW/QA. The board has been effectively static for 48 hours.
1.3 Review queue
Median 15 days, oldest 28. Half the queue has been waiting longer than the sprint has existed. Five items have sat there since 10 July, carried in from sprint 0701 — they will now be carried into 0703 having passed through two full sprints untouched.
Measured from audit trails, not Last Modified — see the appendix.
1.4 REVIEW/QA still has no exit
Unchanged from yesterday and worth restating on the sprint's last day. Across the sprint's entire recorded history:
| Transition | Count |
|---|---|
| Into REVIEW/QA | 103 |
| Out of REVIEW/QA | 3 — all backwards to In progress, all by Fortune |
| REVIEW/QA → Done | 0 |
All 12 completion events went straight from In progress or To do to Done, bypassing review. The queue is not a slow verification step; it is a status with no outlet.
Team performance
From audit trails (when work moved) and git (what was written). Flow measures only — see 2.4.
2.1 Per person
| Person | Sub. 7d | Median cycle | Open WIP | Oldest WIP | Commits 7d | Today | Board completions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ayomikun Araoye | 12 | 5d | 3 | 7d | 50 | 10 | 0 |
| David Samuel | 16 | 1d | 1 | 2d | 27 | 0 | 0 |
| Philip Chidera | 0 | 4d | 0 | — | — | — | 11 |
| Promise Udo | not on board | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | not on board |
Commits sum each person's two git identities (see the skill's identity table; the Phoenixdadhev → Ayomikun and Davidtariq96 → David mappings are inference, not confirmation).
Ayomikun is carrying the codebase this week: 50 commits, 10 today, and the entire content of today's drift — the upload module, the admin deletion refactor and the schema migration are all his. His 3 open items include one at 7 days, above his own 5-day median, which usually means stuck rather than large.
David shows the fastest cycle on the team (1-day median, 16 submitted this week) but no commits today after 22 in the preceding week. A single quiet day is not a signal; two would be.
Philip has completed 11 items — every board completion — but has submitted nothing for 8 days and holds no open work. His design items finished mid-sprint. Idle, working untracked, or waiting on something is not visible here.
Promise remains unmeasurable from the board and now shows 8 days without a commit to beevia-admin. This is the second consecutive report flagging it.
2.2 Output is steady; acceptance is zero
Roughly 17–25 a week, no decline, against zero acceptances ever (1.4). The constraint is not the rate at which work is produced.
2.3 Repository activity
| Repo | Last commit | Status |
|---|---|---|
beevia-api | 07 Aug (today) | Active |
beevia-admin-api | 06 Aug | Active |
beevia-db-schema | 06 Aug (release bot) | Active |
beevia-mobile | 06 Aug | Active |
beevia-admin | 30 Jul | Stalled 8 days |
2.4 What these numbers do not measure
Not productivity. Commit counts reward small commits; cycle time rewards small items. Neither measures difficulty or quality.
Not workload fairness. With 0/120 estimation points there is no way to normalise a mobile screen against a payments endpoint.
Not individual fault. Nothing is stuck because of the person holding it; review has no exit (1.4).
Not complete. Fortune does no development by design; Promise is absent from the board entirely.
What shipped this cycle
3.1 Consumer API: 100 → 105 endpoints
A new upload module landed today and is now documented in openapi.yaml:
| Method | Path | Limit |
|---|---|---|
| POST | /upload/image | 5 MB · jpg, jpeg, png, gif, webp |
| POST | /upload/thumbnail | 2 MB · jpg, jpeg, png, webp |
| POST | /upload/video | 50 MB · mp4, webm, ogv |
| POST | /upload/document | 20 MB · pdf, doc, docx, txt |
| DELETE | /upload?key= | issued keys only |
These objects are public and permanent. The routes require a session, but the resulting URL has no expiry and no authentication. That is deliberate — avatars and group images need it — but it sits in the same bucket as encrypted attachments, separated only by key prefix. DELETE /upload validates the prefix specifically so it cannot reach attachment ciphertext. Nothing private should ever be sent here.
3.2 Admin: reversible account deletion
beevia-admin-api and beevia-db-schema reworked account termination. The user_status enum changed:
is_deleted folded into status
deleting renamed to deactivated — admin-ended, reversible, nothing destroyed
deleted remains user-ended and terminal — PII scrubbed, phone recycled
The route count did not change, so the audit reported [OK] while three spec locations were stale. Route-count parity is not contract parity; the enums in openapi.yaml and openapi.admin.yaml have been corrected. Worth remembering: a refactor can invalidate a spec without adding or removing a single route.
3.3 Mobile
No commits today after 22 in the previous week. Nothing merged that touches the API surface.
Product-vs-PRD gap
Unchanged. None of it moved.
| PRD capability | State |
|---|---|
| Cross-currency conversion | Not built. PaymentService still hard-codes NGN via activeNgn(). |
| Virtual cards | Not built. No module, table or provider capability. |
| Two KYC tiers | Local only. No international path for USD/GBP/EUR. |
| Consent management | Not built. Required for the Phase 4 compliance gate. |
| Payments read path | Missing. No GET /payments. |
Detail: api-rfc.md §4–§5, openapi.proposed.yaml.
Risks
Sprint 0702 closes today having accepted nothing. 74 items roll forward unless triaged in the next few hours. Sprint 0703 then begins in the same state this one is ending in.
The board no longer describes the work. Two days of zero recorded movement against 13 commits and five new endpoints. Any planning done from board data alone will be wrong in both directions — understating delivery and overstating what remains.
beevia-admin stalled 8 days, and because Promise has no board presence no board metric can surface it. Second consecutive report.
Advice is not converting into action. Six of seven previous recommendations are unstarted (§6). That pattern matters more than any individual item on the list.
The PRD gap is static while effort goes to chat, onboarding, uploads and admin.
Epic reporting still blind — ZohoSprints.epic.READ missing.
Previous recommendations — where they stand
From project-status-2026-08-06.md.
| # | Recommendation | Status |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Name the reviewer, today | Not done. 0 items left review; the queue has still never released one. |
| 2 | Triage the 37 items aged 14+ days | Not done. Still exactly 37. |
| 3 | Do not roll all 74 forward | Pending — decided today, verifiable in the next report. |
| 4 | Add coarse sizing to the next sprint | Not done. 0/120 items carry estimates. |
| 5 | Check whether Promise is blocked | Unknown. No commits for 8 days; no answer visible in the data. |
| 6 | Get Promise's work onto the board | Not done. Still 0 assigned items. |
| 7 | Add the epic scope to the Zoho token | Not done. Epic blank on all 120. |
Six unstarted, one pending. The previous edition cut its list from five items to one on the theory that a shorter list would be acted on; that did not happen either. The constraint is not the length of the list.
What I would do today
Sprint 0702 ends in hours. Only the first two matter before it closes.
Decide what rolls into 0703, item by item, for the 37 items aged 14+ days. Some are almost certainly complete and merely unmarked — mark them. The rest should be explicitly scheduled or dropped. Doing nothing carries all 74 forward by default, which is the choice that produced this sprint.
Have whoever accepts work accept something. One item moving REVIEW/QA → Done would establish the path exists. Zero have in the sprint's entire history, and until one does, “in review” is not a state work can leave.
Then, before 0703 is planned:
Assign Promise's admin-dashboard work in Zoho, and check whether he is blocked — 8 days of silence on a workstream nothing else can see.
Add S/M/L sizing. Three reports have now been unable to forecast anything.
Add ZohoSprints.epic.READ — a re-authorisation, no code change.
Standing from earlier reports, unchanged: admin hardening (2FA, fail-closed guards, separate admin JWT secret, Swagger off in production), and the FX / card-issuing partner decisions.
Appendix — method
Pipeline. beevia-refresh skill: sprint export → repo sync → drift audit → spec updates → this report.
Sources
| Stream | Artifact |
|---|---|
| Board | beevia-sprint-board-2026-08-07.csv — 120 rows, 89 leaves |
| Flow | beevia-activity-2026-08-07.json — 120 audit trails |
| Code | all five repos at origin/main, 2026-08-07 |
| Specs | openapi.yaml (105), openapi.proposed.yaml (52), openapi.admin.yaml (29), openapi.admin.proposed.yaml (23) — all validated, no drift after today's updates |
Queue age and throughput come from audit trails, never Last Modified. Bulk board operations rewrite that column on many items at once without producing per-item entries; using it overstated recent inflow ~5× in the 2026-08-05 edition and produced a “the queue is new, not stale” conclusion that was wrong.
Spec drift was found by route count; contract drift was not. The admin status-enum rename produced no route change, so the audit read [OK] while three spec locations were stale. Contract-level checking is not automated — it needs the sync report's changed-file list to be read.
What this report cannot tell you
Velocity, or whether the remaining work fits — no estimation points.
Epic distribution — blocked on an OAuth scope.
Whether an item in review is genuinely complete — only that its status changed and when.
Admin dashboard progress — Promise has no board presence; judge from beevia-admin commits.
Why the board was static for two days while the code moved. That gap is the most important open question here and it is not answerable from any artifact in this workspace.